New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
workaround for borderless #540
Comments
[Original comment by motif] couldn't add i3log since it's generally larger than 1 MB |
This is pretty much by design (of the implementation). I guess an acceptable way of achieving the wanted behaviour is to configure the window (in case it is borderless) to use less space than it normally would. I will look into this, but not before the release of 4.1. |
-ETIME, moving to 4.3 |
[Original comment by motif] saw 4.1 has quite # of enhancement and bug fixes, particularly like the floating windows focus capability and looks like the problems with properly vertical/horizontal split are resolved?.... really like i3's performance btw, simple, clean, fully flexible and not bloated at all.... (though haven't tried 4.1.x yet) |
[Original comment by klaas@…] I attached a patch with a new command which can solve this issue: There are some things I'm not entirely happy with:
|
Hey klaas, Thanks for working on this. I’ve looked at your patch and while it works, I’m not very happy with it. Introducing a new command to work around things like that is really not worth it and I’d like to avoid cluttering i3 with X11 workarounds. Instead, how about the following course of action? I’ve read that Openbox 3.4 does not honor the size increments in fullscreen mode (see http://openbox.org/wiki/Help:Upgrading_to_3.4#Maximized_terminal_windows) and that at least urxvt, xterm and gnome-terminal cope with that just fine (I additionally tested ROXterm, which also works). Openbox 3.4 was released several years ago and they still do it that way, so it can’t horribly break things. Therefore, I suggest we just don’t honor resize increment hints in tiling mode ever (but for floating windows, like GIMP toolbars, which rely on it). What do you think? Best regards, |
[Original comment by anonymous] That would be perfect. I did not dare suggest that and didn't know that Openbox does it. In my opinion size increment hints are very much tied to a floating layout and there's no satisfying way to handle them in a tiling mode - except letting the application handle the extra space. |
I’ve posted to the mailing list, unless any good reason comes up for NOT doing it, i3 v4.3 will ignore size increment hints. |
This ticket was fixed in commit http://c.i3wm.org/40b12c0a: As discussed on the mailing list and the bugtracker. fixes #540 |
[Original comment by Robert.Siemer-i3wm.org@…] You asked for reasons to honor size increment hints some time ago. I’m surprised no-one spoke up yet. i3 is all about screen space: If I have a terminal (or two: one above the other) next to a browser, I would like to snap to a size (when resizing with a mouse) where I lose no space in the terminal(s) which I could use better in the browser. When resizing “in steps” with the keyboard jumping to a point in this grid would be nice sometimes, too. If there are competing increments, ignoring them all together is a good first approach. |
[Originally reported by motif]
(New ticket created for the borderless problem/workaround described in ticket #535.
To produce the problems:
[unrelated:
i3 doesn't seem to be handling some window hints from urxvt correctly]
with background color, in attached example, black.
Attached i3log and screenshot.
Agreed with the comments about width/height_increment.
#535 history below:
They are used for terminals where incrementing the size does only make sense if you increment by one character (width) or one line (height). Some other programs also use that (for example GIMP). Commenting this out is not a solution. Please create a separate ticket for this problem with detailed steps on how to reproduce it (and screenshots).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: